Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Government drags its feet with new digital markets bill

A new report by MPs on the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee has called on the Government to push forward with a draft Digital Markets Bill that would allow regulators to take a more proactive approach to curbing big tech dominance.

The bill would enshrine the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) Digital Markets Unit (DMU) into law and provide the unit with a greater ability to intervene on more micro details of Silicon Valley strategy.

This would add to the CMA’s already extensive powers to investigate seen most recently with its decision to block Meta’s acquisition of Giphy.

“The Competition, Consumer and Digital Markets Bill has wide support and should be prioritised, especially given the difficulty the Government currently has at passing other laws which are more controversial,” BEIS Committee Chair Darren Jones said.

“There are many areas in the economy where stronger competition is required in the interests of consumers, small business and economic growth and this bill is an essential stepping stone to driving this issue forward.”

However, executive director at the Tony Blair Institute Sam Sharps has said that the reluctance to create a new regulatory framework is based on a more pro-Brexit stance towards competition.

“It seems like something that Brussels would do,” Sharps said, explaining that the government feels more focused on moving away from the EU than emulating it with the DMU.

Institute of Economic Affairs’ Matthew Lesh also said, that the DMU runs the risk of threatening the tech ecosystem, putting excessive burdens on companies that make the likes of Google less inclined to invest in new products here.

“CMA already has a lot of power, so not sure if they need that,” he said.

A report from the Institute of Economic Affairs previously criticised the DMU, stating that there was a danger that the vague criterion given would curb innovation across UK start-ups.

IEA fear that overbearing regulation would impose intrusive controls and ‘central planning’, reminiscent of the regulation of old-style utility industries.

As pointed out by Sharps,  it is possible that a DMU enshrined in legislation could block a route where it is impossible for startups to be acquired for a hefty sum by bigger players: a key driver for innovation and growth in business.

For instance, if a code of conduct laid out conditions where it blocked Google or Facebook parent companies from buying other companies, this could include other players who could benefit from acquisition.

On the flip side, he said that more rules around big tech dominance could unlock more opportunities for startups: where they aren’t unfairly disadvantaged against the Googles of the world.

A CMA Spokesperson said: “We welcome and thank members of the Committee for their report. The CMA will now carefully consider and respond to the Committee’s recommendations in due course.”

Read more:
Government drags its feet with new digital markets bill

You May Also Like


What price happiness? The answer might be £3,360 a year, as the average UK worker would take a 10.5% pay cut to work for...


After taking a breather in the week before this one, the Indian equity markets resumed their up move. The headline index continued with its...


Small businesses are bringing forward their finance applications in order to beat expected further interest rate rises, according to new research. Four-in-ten (44%) SME...


The bears have been in charge of the market for months now, going back to the beginning of January when the S&P topped out...

Dislaimer:, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2023 | All Rights Reserved